FSOL vs. FUTY
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. FSOL is actively managed, while FUTY is passively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FUTY.
Performance
FSOL vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -43.66% return, which is significantly lower than FUTY's 6.83% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- -18.63%
- YTD
- -43.66%
- 6M
- -43.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTY
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
FSOL vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -43.66% | -10.66% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 6.83% | -3.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and FUTY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FUTY
FSOL vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSOL | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, which is greater than FUTY's maximum drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and FUTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.33% | -36.44% | -19.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -3.99% | -48.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -6.03% | -25.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.18% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.21% | 14.46% | +58.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.21% | 17.06% | +56.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.21% | 19.08% | +54.13% |
FSOL vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FSOL vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than FUTY's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.60% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and FUTY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FSOL.
FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.13% for FSOL.
FSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.08% for FUTY.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and FUTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer