FSNUY vs. CAH
Compare and contrast key facts about Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR (FSNUY) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH).
Performance
FSNUY vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSNUY vs. CAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSNUY Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR | -10.19% | 67.46% | 13.27% | 14.30% | -28.04% | -13.22% | -14.81% | 16.17% | -36.99% | 0.26% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 3.08% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
Fundamentals
FSNUY:
$115.98B
CAH:
$50.08B
FSNUY:
$0.14
CAH:
$6.98
FSNUY:
92.37
CAH:
30.27
FSNUY:
6.58
CAH:
0.72
FSNUY:
5.10
CAH:
0.21
FSNUY:
$22.80B
CAH:
$244.49B
FSNUY:
$5.68B
CAH:
$8.86B
FSNUY:
$3.38B
CAH:
$3.23B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSNUY achieves a -10.19% return, which is significantly lower than CAH's 3.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FSNUY has underperformed CAH with an annualized return of -1.87%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.03% annualized return.
FSNUY
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -14.77%
- YTD
- -10.19%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- -1.87%
CAH
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 35.40%
- 1Y
- 55.30%
- 3Y*
- 43.16%
- 5Y*
- 31.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSNUY vs. CAH — Risk / Return Rank
FSNUY
CAH
FSNUY vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR (FSNUY) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSNUY | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 1.85 | -1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 2.82 | -1.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.39 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 4.41 | -3.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | 10.14 | -9.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSNUY | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 1.85 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 1.24 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.45 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.57 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSNUY and CAH is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FSNUY vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
FSNUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than CAH's 0.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSNUY Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR | 2.14% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 3.20% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 0.58% | 0.51% | 0.45% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
FSNUY vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSNUY drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, which is greater than CAH's maximum drawdown of -61.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNUY and CAH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSNUY | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.49% | -61.93% | -14.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.01% | -12.88% | -31.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.27% | -24.69% | -40.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.49% | -47.23% | -29.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.67% | -8.08% | -34.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.66% | -15.96% | -12.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.50% | 5.61% | +17.89% |
Volatility
FSNUY vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR (FSNUY) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 7.03%. This indicates that FSNUY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSNUY | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 7.03% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.72% | 22.84% | +12.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.88% | 30.05% | +8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 25.21% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.91% | 29.26% | +1.65% |
Financials
FSNUY vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FSNUY vs. CAH - Profitability Comparison
FSNUY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 6.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.21B and revenue of 65.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.
FSNUY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR reported an operating income of 525.03M and revenue of 6.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 707.00M and revenue of 65.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
FSNUY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR reported a net income of 357.61M and revenue of 6.10B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 471.00M and revenue of 65.44B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.