PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSNUY vs. BAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FSNUY vs. BAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR (FSNUY) and Baxter International Inc. (BAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSNUY achieves a -12.65% return, which is significantly lower than BAX's 18.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FSNUY has outperformed BAX with an annualized return of -2.58%, while BAX has yielded a comparatively lower -5.56% annualized return.


FSNUY

1D
0.50%
1M
11.54%
6M
-12.59%
YTD
-12.65%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
-2.58%

BAX

1D
0.71%
1M
8.44%
6M
7.47%
YTD
18.49%
1Y
-20.51%
3Y*
-19.43%
5Y*
-20.82%
10Y*
-5.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSNUY vs. BAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSNUY
Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR
-12.65%67.46%13.27%14.30%-28.04%-13.22%-14.81%16.17%-36.99%0.26%
BAX
Baxter International Inc.
18.49%-33.28%-22.40%-21.91%-39.58%8.48%-2.95%28.40%2.89%47.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FSNUY and BAX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2011

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FSNUY:

$110.48B

BAX:

$11.68B

EPS

FSNUY:

€0.16

BAX:

-$1.74

PS Ratio

FSNUY:

4.16

BAX:

1.03

PB Ratio

FSNUY:

4.83

BAX:

1.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

FSNUY:

€23.07B

BAX:

$11.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FSNUY:

€5.82B

BAX:

$3.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

FSNUY:

€3.35B

BAX:

$399.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSNUY vs. BAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSNUY
FSNUY Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSNUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSNUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSNUY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FSNUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSNUY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BAX
BAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSNUY vs. BAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR (FSNUY) and Baxter International Inc. (BAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSNUYBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.94

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

-0.51

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

-0.76

+0.79

FSNUY vs. BAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSNUY Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the BAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSNUY and BAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSNUY vs. BAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSNUY drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, smaller than the maximum BAX drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNUY and BAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSNUYBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.49%

-81.15%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.39%

-45.49%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.39%

-65.90%

+13.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.24%

-80.61%

+16.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.49%

-81.15%

+4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.24%

-73.00%

+28.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.00%

-21.74%

-7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.92%

31.55%

+2.37%

Volatility

FSNUY vs. BAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR (FSNUY) is 6.71%, while Baxter International Inc. (BAX) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that FSNUY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSNUYBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

11.66%

-4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.77%

33.52%

-12.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.22%

47.14%

-7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.09%

34.13%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.97%

29.42%

+1.55%

Dividends

FSNUY vs. BAX - Dividend Comparison

FSNUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than BAX's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAX
Baxter International Inc.
0.88%2.72%3.57%3.00%2.26%1.26%1.19%1.02%1.11%0.94%1.14%87.05%
FSNUY
Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR
2.52%1.92%0.00%3.20%3.44%1.82%2.04%1.08%1.27%0.58%0.51%0.45%

Financials

FSNUY vs. BAX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR and Baxter International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.91B
2.70B
(FSNUY) Total Revenue
(BAX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FSNUY values in EUR, BAX values in USD

FSNUY vs. BAX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR and Baxter International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
26.4%
33.0%
Portfolio components
FSNUY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR reported a gross profit of 1.56B and revenue of 5.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.

BAX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Baxter International Inc. reported a gross profit of 891.00M and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

FSNUY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR reported an operating income of 639.34M and revenue of 5.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

BAX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Baxter International Inc. reported an operating income of -42.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.

FSNUY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fresenius SE & Co KGaA ADR reported a net income of 442.15M and revenue of 5.91B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

BAX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Baxter International Inc. reported a net income of 190.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FSNUY and BAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAX has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to FSNUY (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSNUY dropped -76.49% vs BAX's -81.15%.

FSNUY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSNUY and BAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer