PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMSX vs. FCRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMSX vs. FCRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMSX achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly higher than FCRIX's 2.72% return.


FSMSX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.00%
YTD
3.77%
6M
3.86%
1Y
7.96%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*

FCRIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.59%
YTD
2.72%
6M
3.59%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMSX vs. FCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSMSX
FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
3.77%4.13%4.63%5.44%3.17%13.97%-3.66%0.05%
FCRIX
FS Credit Income Fund Class I
2.72%7.88%9.57%11.96%-10.70%7.50%8.27%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMSX and FCRIX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019

0.28

The correlation between FSMSX and FCRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMSX vs. FCRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMSX
FSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FCRIX
FCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMSX vs. FCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMSXFCRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

2.83

-1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

9.14

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.46

40.46

-24.00

FSMSX vs. FCRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the FCRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMSX and FCRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMSX vs. FCRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMSX drawdown since its inception was -8.94%, smaller than the maximum FCRIX drawdown of -26.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMSX and FCRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMSXFCRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-26.74%

+17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-0.90%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.06%

-3.01%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.13%

-15.33%

+11.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.17%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-3.18%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.20%

+0.28%

Volatility

FSMSX vs. FCRIX - Volatility Comparison

FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX) at 0.71%. This indicates that FSMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMSXFCRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

0.71%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

1.95%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15%

3.01%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.65%

4.22%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

6.38%

-1.73%

FSMSX vs. FCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMSX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FCRIX's 2.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMSX vs. FCRIX - Dividend Comparison

FSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than FCRIX's 10.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCRIX
FS Credit Income Fund Class I
10.12%10.54%8.27%5.56%3.25%5.62%5.72%2.91%0.00%
FSMSX
FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
3.97%4.12%2.48%3.61%4.12%3.22%0.77%2.20%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMSX and FCRIX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMSX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to FCRIX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMSX dropped -8.94% vs FCRIX's -26.74%.

FCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMSX and FCRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer