FSMNX vs. FGOMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSMNX (Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund) and FGOMX (Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund) are both mutual funds - FSMNX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while FGOMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSMNX returned 1.15%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for FGOMX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSMNX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FGOMX.

Performance

FSMNX vs. FGOMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund (FSMNX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMNX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than FGOMX's 33.73% return.

FSMNX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 1.61%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 7.35%
• 3Y*: 4.59%
• 5Y*: 1.15%
• 10Y*: —

FGOMX

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 11.58%
• YTD: 33.73%
• 6M: 37.15%
• 1Y: 64.79%
• 3Y*: 27.19%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMNX vs. FGOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FSMNX Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund	1.61%	5.30%	2.12%	7.55%	-10.43%	1.84%	3.45%	8.74%	2.71%
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund	33.73%	34.20%	7.88%	12.23%	-22.45%	-0.19%	22.10%	22.25%	-4.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMNX and FGOMX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018	0.04

The correlation between FSMNX and FGOMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSMNX vs. FGOMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMNX

FSMNX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FSMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FSMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FSMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FSMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FSMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

FGOMX

FGOMX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FGOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FGOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FGOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FGOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMNX vs. FGOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund (FSMNX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSMNX	FGOMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	4.34	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.18	5.42	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.76	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	6.32	-3.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.14	24.86	-16.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSMNX vs. FGOMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is lower than the FGOMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMNX and FGOMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSMNX	FGOMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	4.34	-1.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.54	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.65	-0.04

Drawdowns

FSMNX vs. FGOMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMNX drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum FGOMX drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMNX and FGOMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMNX	FGOMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-40.14%	+24.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.07%	-12.77%	+9.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.08%	-16.71%	+10.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.85%	-38.04%	+22.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	0.00%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-13.36%	+9.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	3.24%	-2.33%

Volatility

FSMNX vs. FGOMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund (FSMNX) is 1.15%, while Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that FSMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGOMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMNX	FGOMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	7.45%	-6.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.19%	15.74%	-13.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78%	18.63%	-15.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.14%	17.86%	-13.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.62%	19.31%	-14.69%

FSMNX vs. FGOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMNX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FGOMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSMNX vs. FGOMX - Dividend Comparison

FSMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than FGOMX's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund	1.62%	2.17%	2.40%	2.83%	2.42%	4.63%	0.73%	2.13%	0.00%
FSMNX Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund	3.37%	4.38%	3.52%	2.98%	1.74%	1.55%	1.96%	3.57%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMNX and FGOMX in my portfolio?

FSMNX and FGOMX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSMNX or FGOMX?

FGOMX has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to FSMNX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMNX dropped -15.85% vs FGOMX's -40.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.34 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.