PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMNX vs. AMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMNX vs. AMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund (FSMNX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMNX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than AMHIX's 1.35% return.


FSMNX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-2.01%
6M
-0.71%
YTD
0.16%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.56%

AMHIX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.87%
6M
0.70%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
3.01%
ALL TIME*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSMNX vs. AMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSMNX
Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund
0.16%5.30%2.12%7.55%-10.43%1.84%3.45%8.74%2.37%
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
1.35%5.70%6.19%7.18%-12.59%5.28%4.39%8.88%1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMNX and AMHIX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FSMNX and AMHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMNX vs. AMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSMNX
FSMNX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AMHIX
AMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSMNX vs. AMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund (FSMNX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMNXAMHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.58

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.74

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

9.51

-3.79

FSMNX vs. AMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the AMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMNX and AMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMNX vs. AMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMNX drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum AMHIX drawdown of -21.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMNX and AMHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMNXAMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

-21.74%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-2.76%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.07%

-5.71%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.78%

-17.81%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-1.87%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-2.12%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.79%

+0.18%

Volatility

FSMNX vs. AMHIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund (FSMNX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) have volatilities of 0.93% and 0.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMNXAMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.92%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.36%

2.36%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

3.04%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

4.86%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

4.53%

+0.06%

FSMNX vs. AMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMNX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than AMHIX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMNX vs. AMHIX - Dividend Comparison

FSMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than AMHIX's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
3.59%5.26%3.80%3.10%2.53%3.23%3.40%3.46%3.67%4.01%3.55%4.03%
FSMNX
Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund
3.16%4.38%3.52%2.98%1.74%1.55%1.96%3.57%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMNX and AMHIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMNX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to AMHIX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMNX dropped -15.85% vs AMHIX's -21.74%.

AMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMNX and AMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer