PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMNX vs. LSMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMNX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund (FSMNX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMNX achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than LSMSX's 2.43% return.


FSMNX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.73%
YTD
1.71%
6M
2.11%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*

LSMSX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.91%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.64%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMNX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSMNX
Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund
1.71%5.30%2.12%7.55%-10.43%1.84%3.45%8.74%2.37%
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
2.43%3.22%2.22%7.96%-10.03%4.11%4.48%8.16%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMNX and LSMSX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2018

0.84

The correlation between FSMNX and LSMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMNX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMNX
FSMNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FSMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMSX
LSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMNX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund (FSMNX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMNXLSMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.70

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.86

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

9.60

-1.95

FSMNX vs. LSMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the LSMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMNX and LSMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMNX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMNX drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, which is greater than LSMSX's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMNX and LSMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMNXLSMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

-15.00%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-2.82%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.08%

-7.49%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.85%

-15.00%

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-2.84%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.84%

+0.08%

Volatility

FSMNX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund (FSMNX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) have volatilities of 0.80% and 0.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMNXLSMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

0.79%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

2.06%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76%

2.83%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.13%

4.48%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

4.50%

+0.10%

FSMNX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMNX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMNX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison

FSMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than LSMSX's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMNX
Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund
3.37%4.38%3.52%2.98%1.74%1.55%1.96%3.57%0.65%0.00%
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
3.84%3.83%4.30%3.37%2.38%2.73%2.33%2.55%2.34%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMNX and LSMSX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMNX has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to LSMSX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMNX dropped -15.85% vs LSMSX's -15.00%.

LSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMNX and LSMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer