FSMDX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSMDX (Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FSMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSMDX returned 8.41%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSMDX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

FSMDX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMDX achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 8.60% return.

FSMDX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 22.14%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: 11.69%

FSPGX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 7.10%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMDX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	12.78%	10.58%	15.55%	17.20%	-17.27%	22.56%	17.13%	30.53%	-9.38%	17.13%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	8.60%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMDX and FSPGX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FSMDX and FSPGX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSMDX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMDX

FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMDX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSMDX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.85	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.50	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	1.76	+1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.06	5.90	+5.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSMDX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMDX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSMDX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	1.85	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.75	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.90	-0.20

Drawdowns

FSMDX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMDX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMDX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-32.66%	-7.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.16%	-16.17%	+8.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.92%	-23.32%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.07%	-32.66%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.38%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-6.37%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	4.81%	-2.70%

Volatility

FSMDX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMDX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	3.32%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.93%	11.58%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.42%	15.39%	-1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.26%	21.49%	-3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	21.55%	-2.23%

FSMDX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FSMDX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	0.98%	1.10%	2.46%	1.39%	2.07%	3.35%	2.34%	2.86%	2.21%	2.17%	2.23%	2.84%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMDX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

FSMDX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSMDX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FSMDX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMDX dropped -40.35% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.