PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMD vs. VITL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMD vs. VITL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -66.81% return.


FSMD

1D
1.00%
1M
6.31%
YTD
17.58%
6M
15.58%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*

VITL

1D
-3.64%
1M
25.00%
YTD
-66.81%
6M
-69.10%
1Y
-66.51%
3Y*
-8.37%
5Y*
-13.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
17.58%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%20.50%
VITL
Vital Farms, Inc.
-66.81%-15.26%140.22%5.16%-17.39%-28.64%-27.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and VITL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020

0.30

The correlation between FSMD and VITL shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMD vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VITL
VITL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
VITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
VITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMDVITLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.76

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

-0.80

+4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

-1.39

+13.28

FSMD vs. VITL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the VITL Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and VITL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and VITL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDVITLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.67%

-84.20%

+43.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-84.20%

+75.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

-84.20%

+62.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

-84.20%

+62.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-79.77%

+79.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-47.34%

+41.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

48.17%

-45.83%

Volatility

FSMD vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 5.14%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 17.37%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDVITLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

17.37%

-12.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

48.28%

-36.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

61.63%

-45.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

54.16%

-35.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

53.73%

-32.30%

Dividends

FSMD vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.18%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%
VITL
Vital Farms, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMD and VITL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VITL has higher volatility (17.37%) compared to FSMD (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs VITL's -84.20%.

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMD and VITL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer