FSMD vs. GRID
FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) and GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FSMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 10.00%/yr vs 16.83%/yr for GRID. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
FSMD vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.59% return.
FSMD
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 6.31%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 24.02%
- 1Y
- 43.17%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.83%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
FSMD vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 17.58% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 23.59% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 21.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMD and GRID is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FSMD and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FSMD vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSMD
GRID
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Technology
FSMD
GRID
Industrials
FSMD
GRID
Financial Services
FSMD
GRID
-
Healthcare
FSMD
GRID
-
Consumer Cyclical
FSMD
GRID
Real Estate
FSMD
GRID
-
Energy
FSMD
GRID
Basic Materials
FSMD
GRID
Consumer Defensive
FSMD
GRID
-
Communication Services
FSMD
GRID
-
Utilities
FSMD
GRID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMD vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
FSMD
GRID
FSMD vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSMD | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.57 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 12.89 | -1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSMD vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, roughly equal to the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMD | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.67% | -40.56% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -11.73% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -20.77% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -29.64% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.40% | +5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -8.42% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 3.25% | -0.91% |
Volatility
FSMD vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 5.14%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMD | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 9.56% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 17.70% | -5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 20.73% | -5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 21.24% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 22.90% | -1.47% |
FSMD vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMD vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.80% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMD and GRID have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to FSMD (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs GRID's -40.56%.
On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 16.83% vs 10.00% for FSMD. On fees, FSMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 16.83% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.
FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.70% for GRID.
GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMD and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer