PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMD vs. FBCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSMD vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSMD vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
2.86%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%22.36%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
-7.08%18.60%39.05%57.98%-39.10%21.34%42.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's -7.08% return.


FSMD

1D
1.12%
1M
-4.17%
YTD
2.86%
6M
3.53%
1Y
16.98%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*

FBCG

1D
1.68%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-7.08%
6M
-5.08%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSMD vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSMD vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCG
FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMDFBCGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.00

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

1.57

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.82

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.66

6.44

-0.78

FSMD vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMDFBCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.00

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.44

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.68

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and FBCG is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FSMD vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than FBCG's 0.05% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.35%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.05%0.05%0.12%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and FBCG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDFBCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.67%

-43.56%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-15.17%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

-43.56%

+21.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.60%

-9.60%

+5.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-11.78%

+5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

4.28%

-1.26%

Volatility

FSMD vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 6.62%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSMDFBCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

8.39%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.37%

14.84%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.08%

26.33%

-6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

25.82%

-7.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.54%

25.92%

-4.38%