FSMBX vs. TARKX
FSMBX (Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund) and TARKX (Tarkio Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FSMBX returned 4.72%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for TARKX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSMBX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TARKX.
Performance
FSMBX vs. TARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMBX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than TARKX's 24.74% return.
FSMBX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 13.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- —
TARKX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 7.27%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 22.99%
- 1Y
- 62.96%
- 3Y*
- 29.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.29%
FSMBX vs. TARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMBX Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund | 8.56% | -5.43% | 9.81% | 15.38% | -13.81% | 33.39% | 12.72% | 10.24% |
TARKX Tarkio Fund | 24.74% | 30.18% | 21.72% | 26.33% | -30.39% | 24.41% | 27.00% | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMBX and TARKX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSMBX and TARKX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMBX vs. TARKX — Risk / Return Rank
FSMBX
TARKX
FSMBX vs. TARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) and Tarkio Fund (TARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMBX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 3.98 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | 14.81 | -11.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMBX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 2.46 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.41 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
FSMBX vs. TARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMBX drawdown since its inception was -37.37%, smaller than the maximum TARKX drawdown of -40.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMBX and TARKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMBX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.37% | -40.55% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -16.99% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.22% | -36.99% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.22% | -40.38% | +15.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.17% | 0.00% | -5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -10.37% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 4.55% | -0.40% |
Volatility
FSMBX vs. TARKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) is 3.83%, while Tarkio Fund (TARKX) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that FSMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMBX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 8.62% | -4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 21.04% | -10.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 27.50% | -12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 27.54% | -8.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 26.68% | -4.75% |
FSMBX vs. TARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMBX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than TARKX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMBX vs. TARKX - Dividend Comparison
FSMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than TARKX's 4.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMBX Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 1.83% | 3.47% | 0.23% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TARKX Tarkio Fund | 4.41% | 5.50% | 1.51% | 2.98% | 10.62% | 1.40% | 0.50% | 5.21% | 3.34% | 1.70% | 0.47% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMBX and TARKX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TARKX has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to FSMBX (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMBX dropped -37.37% vs TARKX's -40.55%.
TARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMBX and TARKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer