PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMBX vs. PFSLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMBX vs. PFSLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) and Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMBX achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than PFSLX's 45.46% return.


FSMBX

1D
0.97%
1M
3.15%
YTD
10.38%
6M
8.61%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*

PFSLX

1D
2.50%
1M
9.11%
YTD
45.46%
6M
42.51%
1Y
81.66%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
15.47%
10Y*
17.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMBX vs. PFSLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSMBX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund
10.38%-5.43%9.81%15.38%-13.81%33.39%12.72%10.24%
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
45.46%13.27%16.73%26.94%-26.44%31.16%26.05%13.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMBX and PFSLX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.86

The correlation between FSMBX and PFSLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMBX vs. PFSLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMBX
FSMBX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PFSLX
PFSLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PFSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMBX vs. PFSLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) and Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMBXPFSLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.49

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

7.55

-6.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

28.96

-25.51

FSMBX vs. PFSLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the PFSLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMBX and PFSLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMBX vs. PFSLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMBX drawdown since its inception was -37.37%, smaller than the maximum PFSLX drawdown of -91.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMBX and PFSLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMBXPFSLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.37%

-91.83%

+54.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-10.91%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.22%

-91.83%

+66.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.22%

-91.83%

+66.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-82.40%

+78.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-13.88%

+6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

2.84%

+1.30%

Volatility

FSMBX vs. PFSLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) is 3.97%, while Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that FSMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFSLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMBXPFSLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

10.80%

-6.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

20.96%

-10.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

26.09%

-10.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

146.06%

-127.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

104.44%

-82.56%

FSMBX vs. PFSLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMBX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than PFSLX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMBX vs. PFSLX - Dividend Comparison

FSMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than PFSLX's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMBX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund
0.55%0.61%0.14%0.28%1.83%3.47%0.23%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
0.10%0.14%0.02%0.31%0.01%0.17%0.11%0.58%2.93%3.89%0.74%9.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMBX and PFSLX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSLX has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to FSMBX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMBX dropped -37.37% vs PFSLX's -91.83%.

PFSLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMBX and PFSLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer