PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMBX vs. BIGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMBX vs. BIGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) and The Texas Fund (BIGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMBX achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than BIGTX's 17.83% return.


FSMBX

1D
0.28%
1M
0.73%
6M
6.49%
YTD
12.87%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.87%

BIGTX

1D
2.35%
1M
-1.53%
6M
9.80%
YTD
17.83%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
9.98%
ALL TIME*
6.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSMBX vs. BIGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSMBX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund
12.87%-5.43%9.81%15.38%-13.81%33.39%12.72%10.24%
BIGTX
The Texas Fund
17.83%5.98%15.76%11.32%-6.93%23.90%13.11%1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMBX and BIGTX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.84

The correlation between FSMBX and BIGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMBX vs. BIGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSMBX
FSMBX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BIGTX
BIGTX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BIGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BIGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSMBX vs. BIGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) and The Texas Fund (BIGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMBXBIGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

2.13

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

6.69

-4.17

FSMBX vs. BIGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the BIGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMBX and BIGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMBX vs. BIGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMBX drawdown since its inception was -37.37%, smaller than the maximum BIGTX drawdown of -77.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMBX and BIGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMBXBIGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.37%

-77.89%

+40.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-8.92%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.22%

-77.89%

+52.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.22%

-77.89%

+52.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-67.25%

+65.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-17.78%

+10.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

2.85%

+1.28%

Volatility

FSMBX vs. BIGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) is 3.40%, while The Texas Fund (BIGTX) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that FSMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMBXBIGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

4.80%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

11.16%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

14.95%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.70%

126.71%

-108.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

90.64%

-68.88%

FSMBX vs. BIGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMBX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BIGTX's 1.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMBX vs. BIGTX - Dividend Comparison

FSMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than BIGTX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BIGTX
The Texas Fund
6.29%7.38%3.52%2.51%3.06%5.27%0.07%0.08%2.27%
FSMBX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund
0.54%0.61%0.14%0.28%1.83%3.47%0.23%0.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMBX and BIGTX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIGTX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to FSMBX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMBX dropped -37.37% vs BIGTX's -77.89%.

BIGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMBX and BIGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer