TARKX vs. KMVAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TARKX (Tarkio Fund) and KMVAX (Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TARKX returned 14.90%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for KMVAX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TARKX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for KMVAX.

Performance

TARKX vs. KMVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tarkio Fund (TARKX) and Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARKX achieves a 22.55% return, which is significantly higher than KMVAX's 10.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TARKX has outperformed KMVAX with an annualized return of 14.90%, while KMVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.10% annualized return.

TARKX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.01%
• 6M: 12.46%
• YTD: 22.55%
• 1Y: 45.92%
• 3Y*: 24.58%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 14.90%
• ALL TIME*: 13.75%

KMVAX

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -2.38%
• 6M: 6.16%
• YTD: 10.95%
• 1Y: 10.56%
• 3Y*: 18.39%
• 5Y*: 12.24%
• 10Y*: 11.10%
• ALL TIME*: 8.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KMVAX Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TARKX Tarkio Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TARKX vs. KMVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TARKX Tarkio Fund	22.55%	30.18%	21.72%	26.33%	-30.39%	24.41%	27.00%	29.54%	-23.30%	29.04%
KMVAX Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund	10.95%	14.44%	27.82%	20.42%	-16.01%	28.83%	2.96%	27.03%	-19.72%	16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TARKX and KMVAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011	0.85

The correlation between TARKX and KMVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TARKX vs. KMVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TARKX

TARKX Risk / Return Rank: 53
TARKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
TARKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TARKX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
TARKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
TARKX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

KMVAX

KMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 14
KMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
KMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
KMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
KMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
KMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TARKX vs. KMVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tarkio Fund (TARKX) and Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TARKX	KMVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	0.55	+0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	0.89	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.10	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	0.88	+1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.40	2.34	+6.06

TARKX vs. KMVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the KMVAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARKX and KMVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TARKX vs. KMVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARKX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, smaller than the maximum KMVAX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARKX and KMVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TARKX	KMVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.55%	-65.81%	+25.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.99%	-10.22%	-6.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.99%	-21.26%	-15.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.38%	-24.84%	-15.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.55%	-45.41%	+4.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.86%	-3.85%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.30%	-9.94%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	3.83%	+1.12%

Volatility

TARKX vs. KMVAX - Volatility Comparison

Tarkio Fund (TARKX) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX) at 4.29%. This indicates that TARKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TARKX	KMVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.82%	4.29%	+3.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.53%	12.33%	+10.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.25%	16.41%	+12.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.82%	18.45%	+9.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.80%	20.08%	+6.72%

TARKX vs. KMVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARKX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than KMVAX's 1.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

TARKX vs. KMVAX - Dividend Comparison

TARKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than KMVAX's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KMVAX Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund	4.77%	5.30%	7.58%	3.35%	3.57%	3.72%	1.35%	2.11%	9.38%	6.87%	5.64%	0.34%
TARKX Tarkio Fund	4.49%	5.50%	1.51%	2.98%	10.62%	1.40%	0.50%	5.21%	3.34%	1.70%	0.47%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TARKX and KMVAX in my portfolio?

TARKX and KMVAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TARKX or KMVAX?

TARKX has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to KMVAX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARKX dropped -40.55% vs KMVAX's -65.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.