FSMBX vs. SWMCX
FSMBX (Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund) and SWMCX (Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FSMBX returned 4.72%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for SWMCX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSMBX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWMCX.
Performance
FSMBX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMBX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than SWMCX's 12.72% return.
FSMBX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 13.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- —
SWMCX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- —
FSMBX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMBX Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund | 8.56% | -5.43% | 9.81% | 15.38% | -13.81% | 33.39% | 12.72% | 10.24% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 12.72% | 10.54% | 15.28% | 17.20% | -17.31% | 22.55% | 17.03% | 7.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMBX and SWMCX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FSMBX and SWMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMBX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank
FSMBX
SWMCX
FSMBX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMBX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.87 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | 11.01 | -7.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMBX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.74 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.46 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.52 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
FSMBX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMBX drawdown since its inception was -37.37%, smaller than the maximum SWMCX drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMBX and SWMCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMBX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.37% | -40.34% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -8.15% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.22% | -21.07% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.22% | -26.09% | +0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.17% | 0.00% | -5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -6.63% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 2.12% | +2.03% |
Volatility
FSMBX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) at 3.27%. This indicates that FSMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMBX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 3.27% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 9.96% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 13.42% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 18.25% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 20.64% | +1.29% |
FSMBX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMBX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMBX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison
FSMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SWMCX's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMBX Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 1.83% | 3.47% | 0.23% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 1.89% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.49% | 1.59% | 2.93% | 1.45% | 2.44% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMBX and SWMCX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSMBX has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to SWMCX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMBX dropped -37.37% vs SWMCX's -40.34%.
SWMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMBX and SWMCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer