FSMB vs. TSCM
FSMB (First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF) and TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSMB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSCM.
Performance
FSMB vs. TSCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMB achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than TSCM's 4.20% return.
FSMB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
TSCM
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSMB vs. TSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSMB First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF | 1.13% | 0.02% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 4.20% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMB and TSCM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMB vs. TSCM — Risk / Return Rank
FSMB
TSCM
FSMB vs. TSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMB | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.88 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMB | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.38 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
FSMB vs. TSCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMB drawdown since its inception was -6.32%, smaller than the maximum TSCM drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMB and TSCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMB | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -14.87% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.07% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.16% | -6.27% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | — | — |
Volatility
FSMB vs. TSCM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMB | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40% | 20.97% | -19.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.96% | 20.97% | -19.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.92% | 20.97% | -18.05% |
FSMB vs. TSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMB vs. TSCM - Dividend Comparison
FSMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, while TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMB First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF | 3.14% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.40% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.79% | 2.27% | 0.19% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMB and TSCM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.
FSMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
FSMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TSCM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and TimesSquare Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSMB and 0.55% for TSCM.
Find the right allocation for FSMB and TSCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer