PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSM vs. EQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FSM vs. EQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a -14.07% return, which is significantly higher than EQX's -36.12% return.


FSM

1D
-3.88%
1M
-3.33%
6M
-13.80%
YTD
-14.07%
1Y
31.92%
3Y*
35.35%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
-0.84%
ALL TIME*
8.20%

EQX

1D
-4.89%
1M
-11.74%
6M
-37.28%
YTD
-36.12%
1Y
47.76%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$130.20M$117.13M$137.61M
$47.56M$43.76M$48.63M

FSM vs. EQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
-14.07%128.67%11.14%2.93%-3.85%-52.67%101.96%12.09%-32.09%
EQX
Equinox Gold Corp.
-36.12%179.68%2.66%49.09%-51.48%-34.62%34.29%106.43%-4.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FSM and EQX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.67

The correlation between FSM and EQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FSM:

$2.55B

EQX:

$7.06B

EPS

FSM:

$1.05

EQX:

$0.82

PE Ratio

FSM:

8.02

EQX:

10.93

PEG Ratio

FSM:

0.11

EQX:

0.02

PS Ratio

FSM:

2.50

EQX:

2.92

PB Ratio

FSM:

1.58

EQX:

1.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

FSM:

$1.10B

EQX:

$2.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FSM:

$598.05M

EQX:

$866.94M

EBITDA (TTM)

FSM:

$743.42M

EQX:

$1.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSM vs. EQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSM
FSM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

EQX
EQX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSM vs. EQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.17

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.88

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

2.00

-0.52

FSM vs. EQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the EQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSM and EQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSM vs. EQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than EQX's maximum drawdown of -81.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and EQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.25%

-81.06%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.22%

-53.95%

+12.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.22%

-53.95%

+12.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.19%

-71.57%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.29%

-52.19%

+13.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.10%

-38.29%

-6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.79%

23.58%

-2.79%

Volatility

FSM vs. EQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) is 13.20%, while Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX) has a volatility of 15.49%. This indicates that FSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.20%

15.49%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.37%

48.05%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.68%

62.55%

-4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.49%

57.80%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.24%

55.52%

+3.72%

Dividends

FSM vs. EQX - Dividend Comparison

FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


Financials

FSM vs. EQX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. and Equinox Gold Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

FSM vs. EQX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. and Equinox Gold Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

FSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a gross profit of 211.84M and revenue of 342.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

EQX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Equinox Gold Corp. reported a gross profit of 438.50M and revenue of 861.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

FSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported an operating income of 182.18M and revenue of 342.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.2%.

EQX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Equinox Gold Corp. reported an operating income of 390.23M and revenue of 861.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.3%.

FSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a net income of 111.01M and revenue of 342.47M, resulting in a net margin of 32.4%.

EQX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Equinox Gold Corp. reported a net income of 310.11M and revenue of 861.59M, resulting in a net margin of 36.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FSM and EQX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQX has higher volatility (15.49%) compared to FSM (13.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSM dropped -92.25% vs EQX's -81.06%.

EQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSM and EQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer