FSLR vs. BIL
FSLR (First Solar, Inc.) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 10 years, FSLR returned 20.51%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
FSLR vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLR achieves a 21.83% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLR has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 20.51%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.
FSLR
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 50.55%
- YTD
- 21.83%
- 6M
- 24.29%
- 1Y
- 99.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 33.22%
- 10Y*
- 20.51%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
FSLR vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 21.83% | 48.22% | 2.30% | 15.01% | 71.86% | -11.89% | 76.77% | 31.81% | -37.12% | 110.41% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.49% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLR and BIL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSLR vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
FSLR
BIL
FSLR vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSLR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -171.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 87.91 | -86.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 355.35 | -352.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | 2,817.77 | -2,811.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSLR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 19.71 | -17.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 13.16 | -12.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 8.52 | -8.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 2.78 | -2.54 |
Drawdowns
FSLR vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLR drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLR and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.22% | -0.78% | -95.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.10% | -0.01% | -35.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.97% | -0.01% | -59.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.97% | -0.10% | -59.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.26% | -0.21% | -61.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.28% | -0.26% | -63.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.45% | 0.00% | +16.45% |
Volatility
FSLR vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) has a higher volatility of 16.10% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that FSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSLR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.10% | 0.05% | +16.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.80% | 0.13% | +38.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.48% | 0.20% | +56.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.65% | 0.26% | +53.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.61% | 0.26% | +50.35% |
Dividends
FSLR vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
FSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSLR and BIL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSLR has higher volatility (16.10%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLR dropped -96.22% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSLR and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer