FSLBX vs. FRBAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FSLBX (Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio) and FRBAX (John Hancock Regional Bank Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSLBX returned 15.09%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for FRBAX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSLBX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for FRBAX.

Performance

FSLBX vs. FRBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLBX achieves a -7.19% return, which is significantly lower than FRBAX's 19.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLBX has outperformed FRBAX with an annualized return of 15.09%, while FRBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.

FSLBX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 4.59%
• 6M: -5.69%
• YTD: -7.19%
• 1Y: -10.01%
• 3Y*: 15.07%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: 15.09%
• ALL TIME*: 11.28%

FRBAX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.76%
• 6M: 10.95%
• YTD: 19.44%
• 1Y: 35.49%
• 3Y*: 21.83%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 10.90%
• ALL TIME*: 10.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSLBX vs. FRBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio	-7.19%	5.78%	35.74%	27.77%	-17.54%	40.61%	22.66%	31.60%	-15.37%	27.74%
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund	19.44%	11.07%	22.54%	-1.93%	-12.25%	40.51%	-10.11%	27.60%	-17.61%	10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLBX and FRBAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1992	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between FSLBX and FRBAX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSLBX vs. FRBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSLBX

FSLBX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FSLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FRBAX

FRBAX Risk / Return Rank: 54
FRBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FRBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FRBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FRBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FRBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSLBX vs. FRBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSLBX	FRBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	1.55	-2.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.65	2.18	-2.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.28	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	2.31	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.93	6.25	-7.18

FSLBX vs. FRBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLBX Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the FRBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLBX and FRBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSLBX vs. FRBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLBX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, roughly equal to the maximum FRBAX drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLBX and FRBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLBX	FRBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.20%	-67.55%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.67%	-14.22%	-10.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.06%	-25.26%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.87%	-46.15%	+15.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.56%	-52.24%	+11.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.38%	-2.14%	-11.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.88%	-12.24%	-2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.43%	5.24%	+8.19%

Volatility

FSLBX vs. FRBAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) at 5.39%. This indicates that FSLBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLBX	FRBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.74%	5.39%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.49%	14.30%	+3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.23%	21.20%	+1.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.06%	26.30%	-3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.53%	29.25%	-5.72%

FSLBX vs. FRBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLBX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FRBAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLBX vs. FRBAX - Dividend Comparison

FSLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than FRBAX's 7.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund	7.13%	8.82%	9.72%	2.65%	5.83%	5.26%	2.43%	1.75%	1.92%	1.76%	2.94%	4.42%
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio	2.11%	0.67%	0.69%	1.22%	2.09%	1.39%	3.08%	4.25%	8.94%	5.46%	1.25%	6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLBX and FRBAX in my portfolio?

FSLBX and FRBAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSLBX or FRBAX?

FSLBX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to FRBAX (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLBX dropped -68.20% vs FRBAX's -67.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.