FSKGX vs. IMIDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX).
FSKGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017. IMIDX is managed by Congress. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012.
Performance
FSKGX vs. IMIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSKGX vs. IMIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKGX Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund | -7.04% | 7.82% | 20.04% | 21.58% | -26.20% | 21.62% | 29.50% | 36.90% | -6.89% | 10.43% |
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund | -2.83% | -4.88% | 18.11% | 16.29% | -26.94% | 29.42% | 30.57% | 42.36% | -4.98% | 8.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSKGX achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly lower than IMIDX's -2.83% return.
FSKGX
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -11.40%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 6M
- -14.07%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- —
IMIDX
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- -2.83%
- 6M
- -9.79%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSKGX vs. IMIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSKGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IMIDX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSKGX vs. IMIDX — Risk / Return Rank
FSKGX
IMIDX
FSKGX vs. IMIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSKGX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 0.17 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | 0.39 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.05 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.14 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 0.35 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSKGX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.17 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.11 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.59 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSKGX and IMIDX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSKGX vs. IMIDX - Dividend Comparison
FSKGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKGX Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 0.27% | 26.04% | 2.53% | 0.50% | 0.85% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.66% | 13.27% | 27.75% | 6.27% | 5.80% | 12.29% | 2.06% | 10.80% | 2.99% | 0.04% | 1.11% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
FSKGX vs. IMIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSKGX drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, roughly equal to the maximum IMIDX drawdown of -35.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKGX and IMIDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSKGX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.51% | -35.15% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.39% | -12.10% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.51% | -34.88% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.39% | -13.30% | -3.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.05% | -7.26% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 4.64% | +0.64% |
Volatility
FSKGX vs. IMIDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) at 6.85%. This indicates that FSKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSKGX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 6.85% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.97% | 13.52% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.16% | 20.45% | +4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 21.12% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 20.93% | +1.85% |