FSIRX vs. LNOIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FSIRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I) and LNOIX (Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FSIRX returned 5.75%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for LNOIX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSIRX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for LNOIX.

Performance

FSIRX vs. LNOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) and Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIRX achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than LNOIX's 5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIRX has outperformed LNOIX with an annualized return of 5.75%, while LNOIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.91% annualized return.

FSIRX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 8.63%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 16.32%
• 3Y*: 10.11%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: 5.75%

LNOIX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 5.09%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 13.72%
• 3Y*: 7.45%
• 5Y*: 3.04%
• 10Y*: 4.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIRX vs. LNOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	8.63%	10.38%	5.83%	4.58%	-3.34%	15.89%	3.72%	10.55%	-3.99%	4.10%
LNOIX Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund	5.09%	9.40%	1.50%	11.87%	-14.51%	8.43%	8.21%	15.32%	-5.05%	9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIRX and LNOIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between FSIRX and LNOIX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSIRX vs. LNOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIRX

FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

LNOIX

LNOIX Risk / Return Rank: 58
LNOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
LNOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LNOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
LNOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
LNOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIRX vs. LNOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) and Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSIRX	LNOIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	2.16	+1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.92	3.14	+1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.40	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.11	2.77	+5.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	31.78	11.88	+19.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSIRX vs. LNOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the LNOIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIRX and LNOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSIRX	LNOIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52	2.16	+1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.32	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.55	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.56	+0.04

Drawdowns

FSIRX vs. LNOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIRX drawdown since its inception was -33.39%, which is greater than LNOIX's maximum drawdown of -19.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIRX and LNOIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSIRX	LNOIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.39%	-19.03%	-14.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.05%	-5.04%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.81%	-16.50%	+10.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.82%	-19.03%	+6.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.98%	-19.03%	-0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-0.44%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-4.05%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	1.17%	-0.65%

Volatility

FSIRX vs. LNOIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) is 1.31%, while Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) has a volatility of 2.11%. This indicates that FSIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSIRX	LNOIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	2.11%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.77%	5.13%	-1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.74%	6.47%	-1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.92%	9.49%	-2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.74%	8.96%	-2.22%

FSIRX vs. LNOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than LNOIX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSIRX vs. LNOIX - Dividend Comparison

FSIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than LNOIX's 3.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	4.19%	4.72%	4.80%	5.28%	7.33%	5.37%	2.23%	3.09%	9.42%	2.63%	2.37%	1.75%
LNOIX Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund	3.50%	3.65%	1.65%	1.80%	2.60%	1.76%	1.06%	1.91%	1.67%	1.94%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSIRX and LNOIX in my portfolio?

FSIRX and LNOIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSIRX or LNOIX?

LNOIX has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to FSIRX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIRX dropped -33.39% vs LNOIX's -19.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.