FSIGX vs. DFAPX
FSIGX (Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund) and DFAPX (DFA Investment Grade Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FSIGX is a Investment Grade Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while DFAPX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, FSIGX returned 2.10%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for DFAPX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction.
Performance
FSIGX vs. DFAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSIGX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DFAPX's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIGX has outperformed DFAPX with an annualized return of 2.10%, while DFAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.
FSIGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 1.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.84%
DFAPX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSIGX vs. DFAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIGX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund | -0.48% | 7.65% | 1.79% | 6.82% | -13.30% | -0.67% | 9.71% | 9.75% | -0.15% | 4.39% |
DFAPX DFA Investment Grade Portfolio | -0.17% | 7.22% | 1.81% | 6.84% | -12.92% | -1.57% | 9.19% | 9.97% | -0.24% | 3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSIGX and DFAPX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FSIGX and DFAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSIGX vs. DFAPX — Risk / Return Rank
FSIGX
DFAPX
FSIGX vs. DFAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSIGX | DFAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.07 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 2.63 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSIGX vs. DFAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, roughly equal to the maximum DFAPX drawdown of -18.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIGX and DFAPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSIGX | DFAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -18.30% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -2.66% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.20% | -4.69% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -18.15% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.22% | -18.30% | +0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -2.00% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -3.45% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 1.08% | +0.14% |
Volatility
FSIGX vs. DFAPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) have volatilities of 1.02% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSIGX | DFAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 1.04% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 2.92% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89% | 3.82% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 5.82% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 4.89% | +0.14% |
Dividends
FSIGX vs. DFAPX - Dividend Comparison
FSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than DFAPX's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAPX DFA Investment Grade Portfolio | 4.06% | 3.78% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.62% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 2.59% | 2.67% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 2.45% |
FSIGX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund | 3.97% | 4.24% | 4.01% | 4.00% | 2.37% | 1.88% | 6.32% | 3.09% | 3.20% | 2.86% | 4.32% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSIGX and DFAPX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAPX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to FSIGX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIGX dropped -18.22% vs DFAPX's -18.30%.
FSIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSIGX and DFAPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer