PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSIGX vs. FADMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSIGX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIGX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's 3.12% return.


FSIGX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
2.39%

FADMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.76%
YTD
3.12%
6M
3.71%
1Y
10.02%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIGX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSIGX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.47%7.65%1.79%6.82%-13.30%-0.67%9.71%9.75%1.82%
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
3.12%9.01%6.02%9.55%-11.84%3.46%6.72%11.06%-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIGX and FADMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018

0.69

The correlation between FSIGX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSIGX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIGX
FSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FADMX
FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIGX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSIGXFADMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

2.85

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

4.32

-2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.60

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.94

-2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.72

17.30

-11.58

FSIGX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIGX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSIGXFADMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.85

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.73

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.86

0.00

Drawdowns

FSIGX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, which is greater than FADMX's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIGX and FADMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSIGXFADMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-15.98%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-2.62%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-3.99%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-15.98%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

0.00%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-3.07%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.60%

+0.41%

Volatility

FSIGX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) have volatilities of 1.38% and 1.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSIGXFADMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.34%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

2.92%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

3.51%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

4.51%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

4.77%

+0.26%

Dividends

FSIGX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, which matches FADMX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
4.29%4.33%4.16%4.31%2.91%4.23%3.82%4.34%2.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSIGX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.29%4.24%4.01%4.00%2.37%1.88%6.32%3.09%3.20%2.86%4.32%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSIGX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSIGX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to FADMX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIGX dropped -18.22% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSIGX and FADMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer