FSIGX vs. FADMX
FSIGX (Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund) and FADMX (Fidelity Strategic Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FSIGX is a fund fund managed by Fidelity, while FADMX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSIGX returned 0.63%/yr vs 3.28%/yr for FADMX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FSIGX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSIGX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's 3.12% return.
FSIGX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.39%
FADMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- 10.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
FSIGX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIGX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund | 0.47% | 7.65% | 1.79% | 6.82% | -13.30% | -0.67% | 9.71% | 9.75% | 1.82% |
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | 3.12% | 9.01% | 6.02% | 9.55% | -11.84% | 3.46% | 6.72% | 11.06% | -2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSIGX and FADMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FSIGX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSIGX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank
FSIGX
FADMX
FSIGX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSIGX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 2.85 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 4.32 | -2.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.60 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 3.94 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | 17.30 | -11.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSIGX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.85 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.73 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
FSIGX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, which is greater than FADMX's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIGX and FADMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSIGX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -15.98% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -2.62% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.11% | -3.99% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -15.98% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | 0.00% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -3.07% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.60% | +0.41% |
Volatility
FSIGX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) have volatilities of 1.38% and 1.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSIGX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.38% | 1.34% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 2.92% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 3.51% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.07% | 4.51% | +1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 4.77% | +0.26% |
Dividends
FSIGX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison
FSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, which matches FADMX's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | 4.29% | 4.33% | 4.16% | 4.31% | 2.91% | 4.23% | 3.82% | 4.34% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSIGX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund | 4.29% | 4.24% | 4.01% | 4.00% | 2.37% | 1.88% | 6.32% | 3.09% | 3.20% | 2.86% | 4.32% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSIGX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSIGX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to FADMX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIGX dropped -18.22% vs FADMX's -15.98%.
FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSIGX and FADMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer