FSIAX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
FSIAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 31, 1994. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
FSIAX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSIAX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M | -0.88% | 8.59% | 5.03% | 8.83% | -12.06% | 3.22% | 7.30% | 10.76% | -2.93% | 7.54% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.79% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSIAX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIAX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 3.85%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.65% annualized return.
FSIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.85%
VONG
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 18.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSIAX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSIAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSIAX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
FSIAX
VONG
FSIAX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSIAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.04 | 0.84 | +1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 1.36 | +1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.19 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 1.16 | +1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | 4.00 | +6.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSIAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 0.84 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.58 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.80 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.84 | +0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSIAX and VONG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FSIAX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
FSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than VONG's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M | 3.80% | 4.06% | 3.21% | 3.71% | 2.71% | 4.01% | 4.32% | 4.07% | 3.51% | 3.70% | 3.49% | 3.18% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
FSIAX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSIAX drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, smaller than the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIAX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSIAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -32.72% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -16.23% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -32.72% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.19% | -32.72% | +16.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -13.09% | +10.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -4.90% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 4.72% | -4.05% |
Volatility
FSIAX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) is 1.52%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that FSIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSIAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 6.72% | -5.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.30% | 12.34% | -10.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.55% | 22.40% | -18.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 21.35% | -16.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 20.82% | -16.40% |