FSIAX vs. VBR
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR).
FSIAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 31, 1994. VBR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
FSIAX vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSIAX vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M | -0.29% | 8.59% | 5.03% | 8.83% | -12.06% | 3.22% | 7.30% | 10.76% | -2.93% | 7.54% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 3.59% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSIAX achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIAX has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 3.91%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.
FSIAX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
VBR
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 19.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSIAX vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSIAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSIAX vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
FSIAX
VBR
FSIAX vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSIAX | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 0.93 | +1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | 1.43 | +1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.19 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 1.37 | +1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 5.62 | +5.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSIAX | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 0.93 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.39 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.47 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.40 | +1.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSIAX and VBR is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FSIAX vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
FSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than VBR's 1.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M | 3.78% | 4.06% | 3.21% | 3.71% | 2.71% | 4.01% | 4.32% | 4.07% | 3.51% | 3.70% | 3.49% | 3.18% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.90% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Drawdowns
FSIAX vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSIAX drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIAX and VBR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSIAX | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -61.98% | +44.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -14.18% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -24.19% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.19% | -45.28% | +29.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -5.75% | +3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -8.32% | +6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 3.46% | -2.77% |
Volatility
FSIAX vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) is 1.68%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that FSIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSIAX | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 5.40% | -3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | 11.29% | -8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59% | 20.64% | -17.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.43% | 19.85% | -15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 21.73% | -17.31% |