FSIAX vs. FYBTX
FSIAX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M) and FYBTX (Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSIAX returned 3.78%/yr vs 2.56%/yr for FYBTX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSIAX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FYBTX.
Performance
FSIAX vs. FYBTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSIAX achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly higher than FYBTX's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIAX has outperformed FYBTX with an annualized return of 3.78%, while FYBTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.56% annualized return.
FSIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
FYBTX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
FSIAX vs. FYBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M | 2.81% | 8.59% | 5.03% | 8.83% | -12.06% | 3.22% | 7.30% | 10.76% | -2.93% | 7.54% |
FYBTX Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund | 1.07% | 5.72% | 5.13% | 6.08% | -3.50% | -0.54% | 3.99% | 5.07% | 1.66% | 1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSIAX and FYBTX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FSIAX and FYBTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSIAX vs. FYBTX — Risk / Return Rank
FSIAX
FYBTX
FSIAX vs. FYBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSIAX | FYBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.54 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.28 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 13.14 | -1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSIAX vs. FYBTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSIAX drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, which is greater than FYBTX's maximum drawdown of -6.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIAX and FYBTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSIAX | FYBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -6.00% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -1.19% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.13% | -1.19% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -6.00% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.19% | -6.00% | -10.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.20% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -0.71% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.30% | +0.33% |
Volatility
FSIAX vs. FYBTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) at 0.47%. This indicates that FSIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSIAX | FYBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 0.47% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.23% | 1.37% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 1.87% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 2.20% | +2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 1.92% | +2.53% |
FSIAX vs. FYBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSIAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FYBTX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSIAX vs. FYBTX - Dividend Comparison
FSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than FYBTX's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M | 4.04% | 4.06% | 3.21% | 3.71% | 2.71% | 4.01% | 4.32% | 4.07% | 3.51% | 3.70% | 3.49% | 3.18% |
FYBTX Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund | 4.74% | 4.66% | 3.67% | 2.76% | 1.26% | 1.65% | 2.31% | 2.72% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSIAX and FYBTX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSIAX has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to FYBTX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIAX dropped -17.81% vs FYBTX's -6.00%.
FYBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSIAX and FYBTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer