FSIAX vs. FIKUX
FSIAX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M) and FIKUX (Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class Z) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSIAX returned 2.17%/yr vs -0.10%/yr for FIKUX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSIAX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FIKUX.
Performance
FSIAX vs. FIKUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSIAX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than FIKUX's 0.03% return.
FSIAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 6.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.26%
FIKUX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- -0.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSIAX vs. FIKUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M | 1.61% | 8.59% | 5.03% | 8.83% | -12.06% | 3.22% | 7.30% | 10.76% | -1.81% |
FIKUX Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class Z | 0.03% | 8.40% | 1.22% | 4.69% | -12.59% | -1.15% | 4.61% | 6.42% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSIAX and FIKUX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FSIAX and FIKUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSIAX vs. FIKUX — Risk / Return Rank
FSIAX
FIKUX
FSIAX vs. FIKUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class Z (FIKUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSIAX | FIKUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.72 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 4.64 | +3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSIAX vs. FIKUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSIAX drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, roughly equal to the maximum FIKUX drawdown of -18.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIAX and FIKUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSIAX | FIKUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -18.63% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -2.81% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.72% | -6.87% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -18.43% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -2.05% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -4.97% | +3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 1.04% | -0.34% |
Volatility
FSIAX vs. FIKUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) is 1.00%, while Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class Z (FIKUX) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that FSIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSIAX | FIKUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 1.14% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | 3.13% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 3.98% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 6.84% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 5.69% | -1.24% |
FSIAX vs. FIKUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSIAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKUX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSIAX vs. FIKUX - Dividend Comparison
FSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than FIKUX's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKUX Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class Z | 3.68% | 4.01% | 4.24% | 3.31% | 1.49% | 0.68% | 2.50% | 2.69% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSIAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M | 3.78% | 4.06% | 3.21% | 3.71% | 2.71% | 4.01% | 4.32% | 4.07% | 3.51% | 3.70% | 3.49% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSIAX and FIKUX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIKUX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to FSIAX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIAX dropped -17.81% vs FIKUX's -18.63%.
FSIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSIAX and FIKUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer