FSHBX vs. FFRHX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSHBX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FSHBX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX returned 2.08%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for FFRHX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSHBX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.

Performance

FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSHBX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX has underperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 2.08%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.98% annualized return.

FSHBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 3.25%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: 2.08%

FFRHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 5.89%
• 3Y*: 7.20%
• 5Y*: 5.40%
• 10Y*: 4.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	0.32%	5.49%	4.73%	5.35%	-3.86%	-0.92%	3.59%	4.20%	1.21%	1.16%
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	1.71%	5.47%	7.10%	12.63%	-1.55%	5.01%	1.69%	8.63%	0.10%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FSHBX and FFRHX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2000	0.10

Return for Risk

FSHBX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSHBX

FSHBX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FSHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FSHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FSHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FSHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FFRHX

FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSHBX	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.50	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	5.94	-2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.87	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	4.97	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	17.06	-6.32

FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSHBX and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSHBX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHBX and FFRHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSHBX	FFRHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-22.20%	+13.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.17%	-1.19%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.17%	-3.29%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.36%	-5.90%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-6.51%	-22.20%	+15.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-0.44%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-1.15%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.32%	0.35%	-0.03%

Volatility

FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) have volatilities of 0.64% and 0.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSHBX	FFRHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	0.66%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.45%	1.63%	-0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96%	2.37%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.22%	2.88%	-0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.86%	4.14%	-2.28%

FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSHBX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

FSHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than FFRHX's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	7.09%	7.41%	6.94%	8.24%	3.81%	2.74%	3.84%	5.15%	4.74%	4.05%	4.44%	3.69%
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	4.18%	4.26%	4.00%	3.00%	0.83%	1.04%	2.62%	2.13%	1.78%	1.27%	1.12%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSHBX and FFRHX in my portfolio?

FSHBX and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSHBX or FFRHX?

FFRHX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to FSHBX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHBX dropped -8.80% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.