FSHBX vs. FFRHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX).
FSHBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 15, 1986. FFRHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 16, 2000.
Performance
FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | -0.20% | 5.49% | 4.73% | 5.35% | -3.86% | -0.92% | 3.59% | 4.20% | 1.21% | 1.16% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | -0.61% | 5.47% | 7.10% | 12.63% | -1.55% | 5.01% | 1.69% | 8.63% | 0.10% | 3.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSHBX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's -0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX has underperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.98% annualized return.
FSHBX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
FFRHX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSHBX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSHBX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank
FSHBX
FFRHX
FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSHBX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 1.51 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.34 | 2.14 | +1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.50 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 1.71 | +1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.73 | 8.28 | +5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSHBX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.51 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 1.84 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | 1.13 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSHBX and FFRHX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison
FSHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than FFRHX's 6.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 3.89% | 4.26% | 4.00% | 3.00% | 0.83% | 1.04% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.27% | 1.12% | 0.88% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 6.75% | 7.41% | 6.94% | 8.24% | 3.81% | 2.74% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 4.74% | 4.05% | 4.44% | 3.69% |
Drawdowns
FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSHBX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHBX and FFRHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSHBX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -22.20% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | -2.74% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.36% | -5.90% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.51% | -22.20% | +15.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.83% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -1.16% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 0.59% | -0.29% |
Volatility
FSHBX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) is 0.58%, while Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that FSHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSHBX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 0.66% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.32% | 1.61% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08% | 3.32% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.18% | 2.84% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.84% | 4.13% | -2.29% |