FSHBX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
FSHBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 15, 1986. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
FSHBX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSHBX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | -0.08% | 5.49% | 4.73% | 5.35% | -3.86% | -0.92% | 3.59% | 4.20% | 1.21% | 1.16% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -5.35% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSHBX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -5.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 2.10%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.
FSHBX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
FCNTX
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- -5.35%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSHBX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSHBX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSHBX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
FSHBX
FCNTX
FSHBX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSHBX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 1.01 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.13 | 1.56 | +1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.22 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 1.79 | +1.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 6.87 | +6.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSHBX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 1.01 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.69 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | 0.82 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | 0.76 | +0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSHBX and FCNTX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FSHBX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
FSHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than FCNTX's 4.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 3.88% | 4.26% | 4.00% | 3.00% | 0.83% | 1.04% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.27% | 1.12% | 0.88% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 4.93% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
FSHBX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSHBX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHBX and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSHBX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -49.19% | +40.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | -11.30% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.36% | -32.59% | +26.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.51% | -32.59% | +26.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -8.18% | +7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -8.18% | +7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 2.95% | -2.65% |
Volatility
FSHBX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) is 0.60%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that FSHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSHBX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 6.51% | -5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.32% | 11.12% | -9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07% | 19.95% | -17.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.18% | 19.19% | -17.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.84% | 19.64% | -17.80% |