FSHBX vs. FAPGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FSHBX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund) and FAPGX (Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond) are both mutual funds - FSHBX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FAPGX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, FSHBX returned 4.78%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for FAPGX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSHBX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FAPGX.

Performance

FSHBX vs. FAPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSHBX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than FAPGX's 1.39% return.

FSHBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 3.50%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: 2.12%

FAPGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.11%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSHBX vs. FAPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	0.56%	5.49%	4.73%	5.35%	-1.27%
FAPGX Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond	1.39%	4.57%	5.32%	5.28%	0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FSHBX and FAPGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2022	0.51

The correlation between FSHBX and FAPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSHBX vs. FAPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSHBX

FSHBX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FSHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FSHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FSHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FSHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FSHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

FAPGX

FAPGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FAPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FAPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FAPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FAPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FAPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSHBX vs. FAPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSHBX	FAPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	3.69	-1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	9.70	-6.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	3.24	-1.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	14.05	-10.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	64.52	-52.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSHBX vs. FAPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the FAPGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSHBX and FAPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSHBX	FAPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	3.69	-1.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.49	3.88	-2.39

Drawdowns

FSHBX vs. FAPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSHBX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, which is greater than FAPGX's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHBX and FAPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSHBX	FAPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-0.49%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.17%	-0.29%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.17%	-0.39%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-6.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-0.06%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	0.06%	+0.25%

Volatility

FSHBX vs. FAPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX) at 0.26%. This indicates that FSHBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSHBX	FAPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	0.26%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.42%	0.83%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97%	1.12%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.21%	1.07%	+1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.86%	1.07%	+0.79%

FSHBX vs. FAPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSHBX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FAPGX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSHBX vs. FAPGX - Dividend Comparison

FSHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than FAPGX's 4.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAPGX Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond	4.63%	4.40%	4.81%	3.44%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	4.17%	4.26%	4.00%	3.00%	0.83%	1.04%	2.62%	2.13%	1.78%	1.27%	1.12%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSHBX and FAPGX in my portfolio?

FSHBX and FAPGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSHBX or FAPGX?

FSHBX has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to FAPGX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHBX dropped -8.80% vs FAPGX's -0.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.