FSHBX vs. DTCPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FSHBX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund) and DTCPX (DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FSHBX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while DTCPX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX returned 2.12%/yr vs 2.12%/yr for DTCPX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSHBX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DTCPX.

Performance

FSHBX vs. DTCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio (DTCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSHBX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than DTCPX's 1.27% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: FSHBX at 2.12% and DTCPX at 2.12%.

FSHBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 3.50%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: 2.12%

DTCPX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 1.45%
• 1Y: 3.80%
• 3Y*: 5.11%
• 5Y*: 1.76%
• 10Y*: 2.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSHBX vs. DTCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	0.56%	5.49%	4.73%	5.35%	-3.86%	-0.92%	3.59%	4.20%	1.21%	1.16%
DTCPX DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio	1.27%	4.58%	5.57%	6.04%	-7.30%	-0.22%	2.70%	6.45%	0.75%	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FSHBX and DTCPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.57

The correlation between FSHBX and DTCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSHBX vs. DTCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSHBX

FSHBX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FSHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FSHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FSHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FSHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FSHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

DTCPX

DTCPX Risk / Return Rank: 65
DTCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DTCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
DTCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DTCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
DTCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSHBX vs. DTCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio (DTCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSHBX	DTCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.31	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	3.42	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.60	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	2.68	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	10.38	+1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSHBX vs. DTCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the DTCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSHBX and DTCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSHBX	DTCPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.31	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.02	0.75	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.15	1.02	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.49	1.11	+0.38

Drawdowns

FSHBX vs. DTCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSHBX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, smaller than the maximum DTCPX drawdown of -10.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHBX and DTCPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSHBX	DTCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-10.78%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.17%	-1.44%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.17%	-1.44%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.36%	-10.78%	+4.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-6.51%	-10.78%	+4.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.21%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-1.69%	+0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	0.37%	-0.06%

Volatility

FSHBX vs. DTCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) is 0.62%, while DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio (DTCPX) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that FSHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSHBX	DTCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	0.69%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.42%	1.40%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97%	1.68%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.21%	2.37%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.86%	2.08%	-0.22%

FSHBX vs. DTCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSHBX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCPX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSHBX vs. DTCPX - Dividend Comparison

FSHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than DTCPX's 4.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DTCPX DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio	4.06%	3.34%	3.64%	3.23%	1.75%	1.67%	1.27%	2.73%	3.12%	1.91%	2.18%	0.00%
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	4.17%	4.26%	4.00%	3.00%	0.83%	1.04%	2.62%	2.13%	1.78%	1.27%	1.12%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSHBX and DTCPX in my portfolio?

FSHBX and DTCPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSHBX or DTCPX?

DTCPX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to FSHBX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHBX dropped -8.80% vs DTCPX's -10.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.