PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSGGX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSGGX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSGGX achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than FSMDX's 12.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FSGGX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 9.60%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.76% annualized return.


FSGGX

1D
3.42%
1M
2.92%
YTD
13.45%
6M
15.37%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
9.60%

FSMDX

1D
2.24%
1M
3.96%
YTD
12.29%
6M
11.02%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSGGX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
13.45%32.93%5.30%15.57%-15.75%7.74%10.73%21.36%-13.93%24.73%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
12.29%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FSGGX and FSMDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.76

The correlation between FSGGX and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSGGX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSGGX
FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSGGX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSGGXFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.58

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

9.88

0.00

FSGGX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSGGX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSGGX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSGGX drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum FSMDX drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGGX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSGGXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.76%

-40.35%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-8.16%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-20.92%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

-26.07%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.76%

-40.35%

+5.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.67%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-4.95%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.13%

+0.80%

Volatility

FSGGX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 4.48%. This indicates that FSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSGGXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

4.48%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

10.46%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

13.80%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

18.32%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

19.34%

-3.09%

FSGGX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSGGX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSGGX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

FSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than FSMDX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.38%2.70%2.91%2.95%2.64%2.60%1.71%2.85%2.66%0.22%0.05%2.44%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.98%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSGGX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSGGX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FSMDX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGGX dropped -34.76% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

FSGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSGGX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer