PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FSEU.L vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FSEU.L vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FSEU.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSEU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSEU.L returned 10.82%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for ACWI. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSEU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

FSEU.L vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FSEU.L is traded in GBp, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEU.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FSEU.L has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 10.82%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.

FSEU.L

1D
0.52%
1M
1.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.30%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
10.82%

ACWI

1D
0.00%
1M
5.05%
YTD
12.54%
6M
11.91%
1Y
30.05%
3Y*
18.20%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEU.L vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS		9.29%27.11%9.24%16.69%-10.53%18.42%5.03%18.30%-10.14%16.67%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		12.92%13.69%19.50%16.16%-8.68%19.79%12.92%21.77%-3.80%13.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEU.L and ACWI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015

0.53

The correlation between FSEU.L and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSEU.L vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FSEU.L
ACWI

Financial Services

28.0%
16.1%

Industrials

17.7%
10.9%

Healthcare

11.5%
8.1%

Technology

8.4%
29.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
9.3%

Energy

5.8%
4.2%

Communication Services

5.4%
9.0%

Utilities

5.4%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.1%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Financial Services

FSEU.L
28.0%
ACWI
16.1%

Industrials

FSEU.L
17.7%
ACWI
10.9%

Healthcare

FSEU.L
11.5%
ACWI
8.1%

Technology

FSEU.L
8.4%
ACWI
29.4%

Consumer Defensive

FSEU.L
8.2%
ACWI
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FSEU.L
6.2%
ACWI
9.3%

Energy

FSEU.L
5.8%
ACWI
4.2%

Communication Services

FSEU.L
5.4%
ACWI
9.0%

Utilities

FSEU.L
5.4%
ACWI
2.6%

Basic Materials

FSEU.L
2.1%
ACWI
3.7%

Real Estate

FSEU.L
1.3%
ACWI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

Often compared with FSEU.L:
FSEU.L vs. BIAHXFSEU.L vs. VHYL.ASFSEU.L vs. SMEA.LFSEU.L vs. GOOGFSEU.L vs. XDEQ.LFSEU.L vs. CS1.LFSEU.L vs. CNDX.L
Often compared with ACWI:
ACWI vs. VTACWI vs. SPYACWI vs. VWRL.LACWI vs. ACWXACWI vs. ACWI.LACWI vs. VOOACWI vs. VTI

Return for Risk

FSEU.L vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FSEU.L
FSEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FSEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEU.L vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FSEU.LACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.01
2.62

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.80
3.45

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.50

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.01

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.05

16.60

-6.55

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSEU.L vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEU.L and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FSEU.LACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.62

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.88

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.83

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.59

+0.15

Drawdowns

FSEU.L vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEU.L drawdown since its inception was -29.40%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -38.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEU.L and ACWI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FSEU.LACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.40%

-38.18%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-7.53%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.08%

-17.98%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.33%

-17.98%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.40%

-26.56%

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.56%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-5.14%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.82%

+0.49%

Volatility

FSEU.L vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FSEU.LACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.26%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

8.84%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

11.50%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

14.19%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

16.47%

-1.82%

FSEU.L vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSEU.L vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

FSEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
FSEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FSEU.L and ACWI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FSEU.L.

FSEU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. FSEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSEU.L and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSEU.L and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer