FSEP vs. BUFZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) and BUFZ (FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds from FT Vest. FSEP is passively managed, while BUFZ is actively managed. Over the past year, FSEP returned 17.62% vs 14.14% for BUFZ. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSEP charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for BUFZ.

Performance

FSEP vs. BUFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEP achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly higher than BUFZ's 4.98% return.

FSEP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 6.56%
• 6M: 7.03%
• 1Y: 17.62%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: —

BUFZ

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 5.69%
• 1Y: 14.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEP vs. BUFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September	6.56%	12.83%	13.56%	11.13%
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	4.98%	11.05%	11.48%	8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEP and BUFZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.90

The correlation between FSEP and BUFZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSEP vs. BUFZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSEP	BUFZ
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FSEP vs. BUFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEP

FSEP Risk / Return Rank: 74
FSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

BUFZ

BUFZ Risk / Return Rank: 86
BUFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BUFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BUFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BUFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEP vs. BUFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSEP	BUFZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.73	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	4.15	-0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.57	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	4.05	-0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.90	21.94	-6.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSEP vs. BUFZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the BUFZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEP and BUFZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSEP	BUFZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.73	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	1.96	-0.86

Drawdowns

FSEP vs. BUFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEP drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, which is greater than BUFZ's maximum drawdown of -10.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEP and BUFZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSEP	BUFZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.79%	-10.14%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.62%	-3.51%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.21%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.14%	-0.64%	-1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	0.65%	+0.46%

Volatility

FSEP vs. BUFZ - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) at 0.77%. This indicates that FSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSEP	BUFZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	0.77%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.79%	4.02%	+1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.52%	5.21%	+2.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.79%	7.33%	+3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.54%	7.33%	+3.21%

FSEP vs. BUFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSEP vs. BUFZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSEP nor BUFZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSEP and BUFZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FSEP and BUFZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSEP or BUFZ?

FSEP has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to BUFZ (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEP dropped -13.79% vs BUFZ's -10.14%.

Which ETF is better, FSEP or BUFZ?

On 1-year performance, FSEP leads with 17.62% vs 14.14% for BUFZ. On fees, FSEP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BUFZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSEP or BUFZ?

Over the 1-year period, FSEP has performed better with a 17.62% return vs 14.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSEP or BUFZ?

FSEP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BUFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSEP or BUFZ?

FSEP and BUFZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FSEP and BUFZ?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FSEP and 1.05% for BUFZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.