PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSENX vs. FSAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSENX vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSENX achieves a 37.55% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's -10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FSENX has outperformed FSAGX with an annualized return of 9.81%, while FSAGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.


FSENX

1D
1.59%
1M
9.38%
6M
20.24%
YTD
37.55%
1Y
44.60%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
25.29%
10Y*
9.81%
ALL TIME*
8.25%

FSAGX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.29%
6M
-28.59%
YTD
-10.86%
1Y
40.81%
3Y*
34.45%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
6.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSENX vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
37.55%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
-10.86%143.05%14.97%-0.37%-13.46%-10.44%26.83%35.50%-13.00%8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FSENX and FSAGX is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1985

0.28

The correlation between FSENX and FSAGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSENX vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FSAGX
FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSENX vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSENXFSAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.17

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

0.98

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

2.17

+7.45

FSENX vs. FSAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the FSAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSENX and FSAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSENX vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSENX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, roughly equal to the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSENX and FSAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSENXFSAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.24%

-77.21%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-37.90%

+25.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

-37.90%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-45.94%

+17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.11%

-50.57%

-21.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-34.72%

+31.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-33.34%

+16.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

17.01%

-12.48%

Volatility

FSENX vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) is 5.88%, while Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that FSENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSENXFSAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

11.61%

-5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

38.36%

-22.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

46.07%

-25.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.01%

34.48%

-7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.84%

33.39%

-2.55%

FSENX vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSENX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FSAGX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSENX vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison

FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than FSAGX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
5.76%2.17%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.60%4.40%0.40%0.00%0.22%3.57%0.00%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.56%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSENX and FSAGX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSAGX has higher volatility (11.61%) compared to FSENX (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSENX dropped -76.24% vs FSAGX's -77.21%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSENX and FSAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer