PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSED.L vs. FUQA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSED.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FSED.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSED.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSED.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
-1.58%614.00%880.11%1,904.36%-220,916.75%112,089.39%
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
-0.62%7.90%19.50%11.85%-0.00%20.50%
Different Trading Currencies

FSED.L is traded in GBP, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSED.L achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than FUQA.L's -0.62% return.


FSED.L

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-1.58%
6M
-277.75%
1Y
-462.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FUQA.L

1D
1.18%
1M
-4.33%
YTD
-0.62%
6M
2.20%
1Y
13.94%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSED.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSED.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSED.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSED.L

FUQA.L
FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSED.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FSED.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSED.LFUQA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.71

1.37

-3.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.06

1.20

-1.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.68

2.03

-3.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.22

7.98

-10.20

FSED.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSED.LFUQA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

Correlation

The correlation between FSED.L and FUQA.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FSED.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

FSED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 501.05%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
FSED.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
501.05%647.10%641.46%589.31%486.33%237.40%
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSED.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSED.L drawdown since its inception was -633.69%, which is greater than FUQA.L's maximum drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSED.L and FUQA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSED.LFUQA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-633.69%

-27.34%

-606.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-275.01%

-10.26%

-264.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-633.69%

-18.99%

-614.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-269.31%

-4.33%

-264.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-134.64%

-3.25%

-131.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

208.92%

1.77%

+207.15%

Volatility

FSED.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FSED.L) is 2.65%, while Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that FSED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSED.LFUQA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.59%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

434.41%

14.31%

+420.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2,175.67%

13.34%

+2,162.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,173.09%

16.40%

+2,156.69%