FSED.L vs. FGLS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FSED.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L).
FSED.L and FGLS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSED.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Mar 25, 2021. FGLS.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 27, 2020. Both FSED.L and FGLS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FSED.L vs. FGLS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSED.L vs. FGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSED.L Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | -1.58% | 614.00% | 880.11% | 1,904.36% | -220,916.75% | 112,089.39% |
FGLS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc | -4.09% | 10.06% | 19.92% | 17.58% | -9.61% | 19.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSED.L achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly higher than FGLS.L's -4.09% return.
FSED.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -277.75%
- 1Y
- -462.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGLS.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- -4.09%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 12.58%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSED.L vs. FGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSED.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FGLS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSED.L vs. FGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FSED.L
FGLS.L
FSED.L vs. FGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FSED.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSED.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | 0.96 | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | 1.39 | -3.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.06 | 1.20 | -1.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.68 | 1.20 | -2.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.22 | 5.08 | -7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSED.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.83 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between FSED.L and FGLS.L is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FSED.L vs. FGLS.L - Dividend Comparison
FSED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 501.05%, while FGLS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSED.L Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | 501.05% | 647.10% | 641.46% | 589.31% | 486.33% | 237.40% |
FGLS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FSED.L vs. FGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSED.L drawdown since its inception was -633.69%, which is greater than FGLS.L's maximum drawdown of -19.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSED.L and FGLS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSED.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -633.69% | -19.90% | -613.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -275.01% | -10.51% | -264.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -633.69% | -19.90% | -613.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -269.31% | -6.09% | -263.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -134.64% | -3.23% | -131.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 208.92% | 2.48% | +206.44% |
Volatility
FSED.L vs. FGLS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FSED.L) is 2.65%, while Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that FSED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGLS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSED.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.96% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 434.41% | 14.48% | +419.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,175.67% | 13.43% | +2,162.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,173.09% | 13.81% | +2,159.28% |