PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSED.L vs. FSMG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSED.L vs. FSMG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FSED.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSMG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSED.L vs. FSMG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSED.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
-1.58%614.00%880.11%1,904.36%-220,916.75%112,089.39%
FSMG.L
Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD
0.93%2.65%2.78%3.90%-5.75%4.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSED.L achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than FSMG.L's 0.93% return.


FSED.L

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-1.58%
6M
-277.75%
1Y
-462.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSMG.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSED.L vs. FSMG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSED.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSED.L vs. FSMG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSED.L

FSMG.L
FSMG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FSMG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSED.L vs. FSMG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FSED.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSMG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSED.LFSMG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.71

0.96

-2.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.06

1.12

-1.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.68

0.94

-2.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.22

1.89

-4.11

FSED.L vs. FSMG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSED.LFSMG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

Correlation

The correlation between FSED.L and FSMG.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FSED.L vs. FSMG.L - Dividend Comparison

FSED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 501.05%, more than FSMG.L's 5.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
FSED.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
501.05%647.10%641.46%589.31%486.33%237.40%
FSMG.L
Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD
5.91%4.83%5.10%4.67%2.87%1.10%

Drawdowns

FSED.L vs. FSMG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSED.L drawdown since its inception was -633.69%, which is greater than FSMG.L's maximum drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSED.L and FSMG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSED.LFSMG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-633.69%

-11.66%

-622.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-275.01%

-4.12%

-270.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-633.69%

-11.66%

-622.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-269.31%

-1.77%

-267.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-134.64%

-4.60%

-130.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

208.92%

2.04%

+206.88%

Volatility

FSED.L vs. FSMG.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FSED.L) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSMG.L) at 1.82%. This indicates that FSED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSED.LFSMG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

1.82%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

434.41%

6.14%

+428.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2,175.67%

7.35%

+2,168.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,173.09%

7.35%

+2,165.74%