PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEC vs. TUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSEC vs. TUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSEC vs. TUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
0.26%8.33%2.40%5.22%0.78%
TUA
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
-3.21%7.27%-3.59%-2.04%-0.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEC achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than TUA's -3.21% return.


FSEC

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
0.26%
6M
1.94%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*

TUA

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.04%
YTD
-3.21%
6M
-2.23%
1Y
-0.42%
3Y*
-1.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSEC vs. TUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than TUA's 0.16% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSEC vs. TUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEC
FSEC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

TUA
TUA Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEC vs. TUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSECTUADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

-0.05

+0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

-0.02

+1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.00

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

-0.02

+1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.57

-0.07

+3.64

FSEC vs. TUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the TUA Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEC and TUA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSECTUADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

-0.05

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.08

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between FSEC and TUA is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FSEC vs. TUA - Dividend Comparison

FSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than TUA's 3.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
4.43%4.22%3.22%3.41%2.21%0.96%
TUA
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
3.74%3.84%5.19%4.83%0.15%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSEC vs. TUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEC drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, which is greater than TUA's maximum drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEC and TUA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSECTUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-15.85%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-6.04%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-8.00%

+6.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-8.35%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

2.10%

-0.60%

Volatility

FSEC vs. TUA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) is 1.92%, while Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that FSEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSECTUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

3.08%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

4.61%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.42%

7.65%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.72%

10.94%

-4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.68%

10.94%

-4.26%