PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEC vs. IBTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSEC vs. IBTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEC achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than IBTO's -0.53% return.


FSEC

1D
0.27%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.38%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*

IBTO

1D
0.10%
1M
0.47%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEC vs. IBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
1.14%8.33%2.40%2.63%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
-0.53%8.23%-0.87%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEC and IBTO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.83

The correlation between FSEC and IBTO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSEC vs. IBTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEC
FSEC Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTO
IBTO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEC vs. IBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSECIBTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.12

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

0.82

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

2.14

+4.56

FSEC vs. IBTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the IBTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEC and IBTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSEC vs. IBTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEC drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, which is greater than IBTO's maximum drawdown of -8.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEC and IBTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSECIBTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-8.36%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-3.66%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-2.59%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-2.37%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.39%

-0.47%

Volatility

FSEC vs. IBTO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) have volatilities of 1.29% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSECIBTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.27%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.27%

3.14%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.29%

4.39%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.78%

6.59%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.60%

6.59%

+0.01%

FSEC vs. IBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTO's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSEC vs. IBTO - Dividend Comparison

FSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than IBTO's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
4.43%4.22%3.22%3.41%2.21%0.96%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
4.15%4.05%4.23%1.66%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSEC and IBTO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSEC has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to IBTO (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEC dropped -17.97% vs IBTO's -8.36%.

On 1-year performance, FSEC leads with 6.18% vs 2.97% for IBTO. On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FSEC has performed better with a 6.18% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FSEC.

FSEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 4.15% for IBTO.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FSEC and 0.07% for IBTO.

FSEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSEC and IBTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer