FSEAX vs. CHILX
FSEAX (Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund) and CHILX (BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - FSEAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while CHILX is a China Equities fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, FSEAX returned 7.64%/yr vs -0.01%/yr for CHILX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSEAX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHILX.
Performance
FSEAX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSEAX achieves a 23.64% return, which is significantly higher than CHILX's 5.98% return.
FSEAX
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 23.64%
- 1Y
- 42.33%
- 3Y*
- 27.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.83%
CHILX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSEAX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund | 23.64% | 36.43% | 21.80% | 13.58% | -31.26% | -14.91% | 73.43% | 31.79% |
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 5.98% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 48.69% | 48.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSEAX and CHILX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between FSEAX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSEAX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank
FSEAX
CHILX
FSEAX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSEAX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.19 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 1.81 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 5.84 | +2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSEAX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSEAX drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEAX and CHILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSEAX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -47.73% | -17.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.33% | -11.64% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -22.21% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.98% | -43.88% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -11.34% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -20.18% | -4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 3.61% | +1.10% |
Volatility
FSEAX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) have volatilities of 9.87% and 10.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSEAX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | 10.16% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.75% | 17.04% | +5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.08% | 20.70% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 20.76% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 22.11% | -0.58% |
FSEAX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSEAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSEAX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison
FSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than CHILX's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.77% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 14.14% | 14.10% | 6.15% | 3.44% | 0.05% | 1.26% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSEAX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHILX has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to FSEAX (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEAX dropped -65.59% vs CHILX's -47.73%.
FSEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSEAX and CHILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer