PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEAX vs. ASIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSEAX vs. ASIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEAX achieves a 39.57% return, which is significantly higher than ASIAX's 20.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FSEAX has outperformed ASIAX with an annualized return of 16.15%, while ASIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.95% annualized return.


FSEAX

1D
1.71%
1M
12.18%
YTD
39.57%
6M
44.64%
1Y
74.85%
3Y*
35.25%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
16.15%

ASIAX

1D
1.42%
1M
10.81%
YTD
20.22%
6M
22.86%
1Y
43.46%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEAX vs. ASIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSEAX
Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund
39.57%36.43%21.80%13.58%-31.26%-14.91%73.43%30.97%-15.08%45.13%
ASIAX
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund
20.22%24.56%9.59%0.87%-10.82%-6.10%25.76%17.78%-11.50%29.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEAX and ASIAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 1997

0.86

The correlation between FSEAX and ASIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSEAX vs. ASIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEAX
FSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ASIAX
ASIAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ASIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEAX vs. ASIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSEAXASIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.52

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.65

3.74

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.59

14.61

+5.98

FSEAX vs. ASIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the ASIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEAX and ASIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSEAXASIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87

2.79

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.42

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.59

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.50

-0.07

Drawdowns

FSEAX vs. ASIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEAX drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, roughly equal to the maximum ASIAX drawdown of -63.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEAX and ASIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSEAXASIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-63.78%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-11.73%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-20.36%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.64%

-31.71%

-21.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.07%

-36.32%

-21.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.68%

-15.10%

-9.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

2.99%

+0.68%

Volatility

FSEAX vs. ASIAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) at 6.18%. This indicates that FSEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSEAXASIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

6.18%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

12.66%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

15.75%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.86%

15.04%

+7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

15.23%

+5.79%

FSEAX vs. ASIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than ASIAX's 1.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSEAX vs. ASIAX - Dividend Comparison

FSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than ASIAX's 17.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASIAX
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund
17.81%21.41%8.68%2.84%7.25%7.71%7.37%5.67%7.17%7.91%1.09%3.15%
FSEAX
Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund
0.15%0.22%0.00%0.08%0.00%14.14%14.10%6.15%3.44%0.05%1.26%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSEAX and ASIAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSEAX has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to ASIAX (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEAX dropped -65.59% vs ASIAX's -63.78%.

FSEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSEAX and ASIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer