FDLSX vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FDLSX (Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - FDLSX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX returned 11.26%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLSX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

FDLSX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLSX achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.26%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.

FDLSX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 7.95%
• YTD: -2.38%
• 6M: -14.72%
• 1Y: -13.58%
• 3Y*: 6.91%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: 11.26%

VOO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 9.30%
• 1Y: 26.77%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLSX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio	-2.38%	-5.30%	20.17%	30.14%	-15.27%	21.66%	18.59%	28.78%	-7.65%	29.09%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	9.75%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLSX and VOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between FDLSX and VOO has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDLSX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDLSX	VOO
Consumer Cyclical	91.2%	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	4.5%
Energy	1.1%	3.2%
Technology	0.6%	39.1%
Industrials	0.5%	7.6%
Communication Services	0.0%	10.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Financial Services	-	10.9%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

FDLSX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLSX

FDLSX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FDLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLSX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDLSX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	2.17	-2.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.71	2.93	-3.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.39	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	3.02	-3.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.81	13.58	-14.39

FDLSX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLSX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDLSX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLSX drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLSX and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLSX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.58%	-33.99%	-17.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.33%	-8.90%	-19.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.33%	-18.69%	-9.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.33%	-24.52%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.44%	-33.99%	-14.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.00%	-1.74%	-18.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-3.68%	-5.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.45%	1.98%	+14.47%

Volatility

FDLSX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that FDLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDLSX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	4.60%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.73%	9.73%	+9.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.61%	12.39%	+9.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.58%	16.90%	+4.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.38%	18.05%	+4.33%

FDLSX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLSX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FDLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio	5.29%	9.12%	7.41%	1.64%	3.32%	22.77%	2.36%	6.43%	19.76%	6.33%	1.01%	5.42%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLSX and VOO in my portfolio?

FDLSX and VOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDLSX or VOO?

FDLSX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLSX dropped -51.58% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.