FDLSX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FDLSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 7, 1984. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FDLSX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDLSX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | -12.27% | -5.30% | 13.64% | 30.14% | -15.27% | 21.66% | 18.59% | 28.78% | -7.65% | 29.09% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLSX achieves a -12.27% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.06%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
FDLSX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- -12.27%
- 6M
- -23.33%
- 1Y
- -13.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDLSX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDLSX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FDLSX
VOO
FDLSX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDLSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | 0.98 | -1.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | 1.50 | -2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.23 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.53 | -2.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 7.29 | -8.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDLSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | 0.98 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.70 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.83 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLSX and VOO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDLSX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FDLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | 10.40% | 9.12% | 1.57% | 1.64% | 3.32% | 22.77% | 2.36% | 6.43% | 19.76% | 6.33% | 1.01% | 5.42% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FDLSX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLSX drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLSX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -33.99% | -17.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.33% | -11.98% | -16.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -24.52% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.44% | -33.99% | -14.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.10% | -6.29% | -21.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -3.72% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.09% | 2.52% | +9.57% |
Volatility
FDLSX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that FDLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDLSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 5.29% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 9.44% | +8.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 18.10% | +6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 16.82% | +4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 17.99% | +4.27% |