FDLSX vs. FSAVX
FDLSX (Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio) and FSAVX (Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX returned 11.26%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for FSAVX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLSX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FSAVX.
Performance
FDLSX vs. FSAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLSX achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly higher than FSAVX's -4.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX has outperformed FSAVX with an annualized return of 11.26%, while FSAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.45% annualized return.
FDLSX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 6M
- -14.72%
- 1Y
- -13.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
FSAVX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -4.70%
- 6M
- -13.74%
- 1Y
- 1.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
FDLSX vs. FSAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | -2.38% | -5.30% | 20.17% | 30.14% | -15.27% | 21.66% | 18.59% | 28.78% | -7.65% | 29.09% |
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | -4.70% | 8.01% | 6.15% | 32.55% | -37.45% | 28.99% | 63.22% | 28.87% | -13.78% | 24.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLSX and FSAVX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1986 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FDLSX and FSAVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLSX vs. FSAVX — Risk / Return Rank
FDLSX
FSAVX
FDLSX vs. FSAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDLSX | FSAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.04 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.11 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 0.25 | -1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDLSX vs. FSAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLSX drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum FSAVX drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLSX and FSAVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLSX | FSAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -81.27% | +29.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.33% | -19.11% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.33% | -19.11% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -41.86% | +13.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.44% | -43.28% | -5.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.00% | -13.99% | -6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -13.37% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.45% | 8.30% | +8.15% |
Volatility
FDLSX vs. FSAVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) is 5.76%, while Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that FDLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLSX | FSAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 6.76% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.73% | 17.08% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 20.68% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 23.83% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 24.07% | -1.69% |
FDLSX vs. FSAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAVX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLSX vs. FSAVX - Dividend Comparison
FDLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, less than FSAVX's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | 5.29% | 9.12% | 7.41% | 1.64% | 3.32% | 22.77% | 2.36% | 6.43% | 19.76% | 6.33% | 1.01% | 5.42% |
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 2.61% | 2.58% | 8.57% | 4.08% | 7.97% | 15.51% | 7.13% | 16.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLSX and FSAVX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSAVX has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to FDLSX (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLSX dropped -51.58% vs FSAVX's -81.27%.
FSAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDLSX and FSAVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer