FSCO vs. XYLD
FSCO (FS Credit Opportunities Corp.) is a stock, while XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) is Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Over the past 3 years, FSCO returned 13.89%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for XYLD. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSCO vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCO achieves a -19.22% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.83% return.
FSCO
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -19.22%
- 6M
- -17.27%
- 1Y
- -24.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
FSCO vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | -19.22% | 3.68% | 34.88% | 36.98% | -3.98% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.83% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCO and XYLD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2022 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCO vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
FSCO
XYLD
FSCO vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSCO | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.57 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 3.16 | -3.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 16.57 | -17.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSCO vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCO drawdown since its inception was -35.53%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCO and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCO | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.53% | -33.46% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.53% | -5.29% | -30.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.53% | -15.53% | -20.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.47% | -0.29% | -29.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -3.71% | -4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | 1.01% | +16.58% |
Volatility
FSCO vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 2.17%. This indicates that FSCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSCO | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 2.17% | +3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.49% | 5.71% | +16.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.31% | 6.79% | +20.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.22% | 11.25% | +16.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.22% | 14.22% | +14.00% |
Dividends
FSCO vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
FSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.32%, more than XYLD's 10.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | 16.32% | 12.65% | 10.47% | 11.26% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.53% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSCO and XYLD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSCO has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to XYLD (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCO dropped -35.53% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSCO and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer