PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCDX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCDX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCDX achieves a 18.62% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 8.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSCDX having a 9.74% annualized return and FSPSX not far behind at 9.36%.


FSCDX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.10%
YTD
18.62%
6M
16.32%
1Y
38.01%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
9.74%

FSPSX

1D
-0.77%
1M
2.15%
YTD
8.67%
6M
10.95%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCDX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCDX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A
18.62%11.85%-2.52%18.29%-20.70%31.22%17.13%32.31%-16.38%13.77%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
8.67%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCDX and FSPSX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.71

The correlation between FSCDX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCDX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCDX
FSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCDX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCDXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

1.90

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.32

7.14

+8.18

FSCDX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCDX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCDXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.47

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.54

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.57

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.50

-0.03

Drawdowns

FSCDX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCDX drawdown since its inception was -50.10%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCDX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCDXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.10%

-33.69%

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-11.39%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.42%

-13.58%

-21.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.42%

-29.41%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-33.69%

-6.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.21%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-6.55%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.03%

-0.55%

Volatility

FSCDX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.55%. This indicates that FSCDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCDXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

4.55%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

12.06%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

14.80%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.15%

15.98%

+6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

16.56%

+5.43%

FSCDX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCDX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCDX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FSCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than FSPSX's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCDX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A
1.61%1.92%0.00%1.36%5.36%10.98%2.70%3.97%14.60%14.03%2.35%8.39%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.90%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCDX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCDX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FSPSX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCDX dropped -50.10% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCDX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer