FSCDX vs. ISCG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG).
FSCDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 9, 1998. ISCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004.
Performance
FSCDX vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSCDX vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.63% | 11.85% | -2.52% | 18.29% | -20.70% | 31.22% | 17.13% | 32.31% | -16.38% | 13.77% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | -1.05% | 12.88% | 13.35% | 23.13% | -26.75% | -1.26% | 43.41% | 27.66% | -6.91% | 24.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCDX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly higher than ISCG's -1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCDX has underperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 8.24%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.
FSCDX
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 22.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
ISCG
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 22.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSCDX vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCDX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSCDX vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank
FSCDX
ISCG
FSCDX vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCDX | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.97 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.50 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.58 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 6.35 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCDX | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.97 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.10 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.46 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.38 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCDX and ISCG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSCDX vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
FSCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than ISCG's 0.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A | 1.90% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 5.36% | 10.98% | 2.70% | 3.97% | 14.60% | 14.03% | 2.35% | 8.39% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.64% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
FSCDX vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCDX drawdown since its inception was -50.10%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCDX and ISCG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCDX | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.10% | -57.72% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -14.09% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.42% | -37.80% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.44% | -41.48% | +1.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -8.39% | -1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -11.71% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.50% | -0.29% |
Volatility
FSCDX vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) is 6.42%, while iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that FSCDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSCDX | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 7.39% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 14.01% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.92% | 23.33% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 22.98% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 23.12% | -1.22% |