FSCDX vs. FSOPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FSCDX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A) and FSOPX (Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSCDX returned 9.74%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for FSOPX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSCDX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FSOPX.

Performance

FSCDX vs. FSOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCDX achieves a 18.62% return, which is significantly higher than FSOPX's 16.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCDX has underperformed FSOPX with an annualized return of 9.74%, while FSOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.

FSCDX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 18.62%
• 6M: 16.32%
• 1Y: 38.01%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 5.96%
• 10Y*: 9.74%

FSOPX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 16.95%
• 6M: 15.23%
• 1Y: 41.34%
• 3Y*: 21.05%
• 5Y*: 10.89%
• 10Y*: 12.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCDX vs. FSOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A	18.62%	11.85%	-2.52%	18.29%	-20.70%	31.22%	17.13%	32.31%	-16.38%	13.77%
FSOPX Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund	16.95%	15.81%	15.31%	20.38%	-17.82%	23.39%	17.03%	29.92%	-8.12%	11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCDX and FSOPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2007	0.96

The correlation between FSCDX and FSOPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSCDX vs. FSOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCDX

FSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FSOPX

FSOPX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FSOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FSOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FSOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FSOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FSOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCDX vs. FSOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSCDX	FSOPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.31	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.27	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.39	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	4.13	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.32	16.16	-0.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSCDX vs. FSOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FSOPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCDX and FSOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSCDX	FSOPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.31	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.50	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.58	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.39	+0.08

Drawdowns

FSCDX vs. FSOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCDX drawdown since its inception was -50.10%, smaller than the maximum FSOPX drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCDX and FSOPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSCDX	FSOPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.10%	-61.75%	+11.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-9.99%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.42%	-27.17%	-8.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.42%	-30.06%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	-39.15%	-1.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-1.56%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.62%	-10.37%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	2.55%	-0.07%

Volatility

FSCDX vs. FSOPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) have volatilities of 5.45% and 5.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSCDX	FSOPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	5.20%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.99%	13.42%	-0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.65%	17.92%	-0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.15%	21.70%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.99%	21.99%	0.00%

FSCDX vs. FSOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCDX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOPX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSCDX vs. FSOPX - Dividend Comparison

FSCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than FSOPX's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A	1.61%	1.92%	0.00%	1.36%	5.36%	10.98%	2.70%	3.97%	14.60%	14.03%	2.35%	8.39%
FSOPX Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund	3.77%	4.41%	9.41%	0.98%	5.16%	30.85%	2.01%	6.67%	13.99%	10.31%	0.69%	5.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSCDX and FSOPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FSCDX and FSOPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSCDX or FSOPX?

FSCDX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FSOPX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCDX dropped -50.10% vs FSOPX's -61.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.