PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSBDX vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSBDX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSBDX having a 18.41% return and SCHD slightly higher at 19.01%. Over the past 10 years, FSBDX has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 22.67%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.


FSBDX

1D
0.93%
1M
8.71%
YTD
18.41%
6M
19.62%
1Y
46.21%
3Y*
32.92%
5Y*
17.44%
10Y*
22.67%

SCHD

1D
0.59%
1M
1.60%
YTD
19.01%
6M
20.36%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSBDX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSBDX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund
18.41%20.31%39.76%57.42%-37.20%22.53%62.77%33.24%4.53%35.27%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FSBDX and SCHD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between FSBDX and SCHD has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSBDX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSBDX
FSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSBDX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSBDXSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

2.57

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

3.98

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

6.17

-2.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.94

15.20

+0.74

FSBDX vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSBDX and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSBDXSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.57

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.59

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.77

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.86

+0.04

Drawdowns

FSBDX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSBDX drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSBDX and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSBDXSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.25%

-33.37%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-4.61%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.09%

-16.13%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.25%

-16.85%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.25%

-33.37%

-8.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-3.32%

-3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

1.87%

+1.07%

Volatility

FSBDX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.92%. This indicates that FSBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSBDXSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

2.92%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

7.66%

+5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.45%

10.96%

+6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

14.38%

+10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

16.72%

+6.79%

FSBDX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSBDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSBDX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSBDX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund
3.15%3.73%8.92%0.54%3.93%24.67%40.16%11.36%15.87%10.80%1.41%13.10%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSBDX and SCHD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSBDX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to SCHD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSBDX dropped -42.25% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

FSBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSBDX and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer